A comparison of the synoptic gospel
Comparison of the four gospels pdf
Conclusion Works Cited 1. Translation: Jesus and others quoted in the gospels spoke primarily in Aramaic , but the gospels themselves in their oldest available form are each written in Koine Greek. Others seem much more significant, one that really stood out to me is the great commandment; in Mark he starts out with "Hear, O Israel: the Lord our God, the Lord is one", both Luke and Matthew copy everything else from this passage but leave that part of the commandment out the lord is one. The Gospel of Luke: Luke was known to be an accurate historian, and as a result he carefully researched everything. Jesus looked upon him, and said, Thou art Simon the son of John: thou shalt be called Cephas which is by interpretation, Peter. This problem concerns the literary relationships between and among the first three canonical gospels of Mark, Matthew, and Luke collectively known as the synoptic Gospels. There were two main reasons Matthew wrote his book. There are many accounts of miraculous events between these three texts, some omitted and some are added. Followed by that comes the crucifixion of Jesus, his death and the ensuing of the tomb.
He is the one who will build a house for my Name, and I will establish the throne of his kingdom forever. Luke approaches his work by making Jesus the Son of man. At the end of this segment, Jesus is left alone. Their are critical differences between these two groups when comparing the historical aspects.
Scholars have contributed a great deal to the understanding of the circumstances of their writing, along with the intentions of their authors.
Often they are replicated side by side, which makes it easier to compare them to each other. But first of all, we will start with the outline of the gospel of Mark, continuing with the origin, the type, the author and time and place of origin.
The similarities of these accounts really makes the differences stand out. First of all, there is the decision of the Jewish authorities on the death of Jesus in chapter Jesus' character and history is portrayed different in these works, yet they do not contradict each other.
Matthew with Emphasis on the Structure and Outline 2.
Synoptic gospels comparison chart pdf
This part is divided into three proclamations of the suffering of Christ ; ; , followed by a lack of understanding by the disciples and then Jesus reacts with a lecture or guidance to make his disciples understand. Matthew's lengthy Sermon on the Mount , for example, is paralleled by Luke's shorter Sermon on the Plain , with the remainder of its content scattered throughout Luke. Philip saith unto him, Come and see. Scenes like for example how Judas plans to betray Jesus, when Jesus and his disciples go to the Mount of Olives or the arrest of Jesus, are left out. Most scholars ascribe this to documentary dependence, direct or indirect, meaning the close agreements among synoptic gospels are due to one gospel's drawing from the text of another, or from some written source that another gospel also drew from. The name and ancestry are given in the first line. Scripture Verses 2 Timothy All Scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness. He shows how Jesus was a real person and how He showed a genuine interest in people from all walks of life. Mark's work is meant to encourage Christians throughout Rome, despite being persecuted for their faith. Luke with Emphasis on the Structure and Outline 2. Mark with Emphasis on Structure and Outline 2. This passage emphasizes the divinity of Jesus, he knows what is going to happen and is awaiting the coming event. If not, the frequent agreements between the two independent gospels against the third must originate elsewhere.
Also the cup of wine refers to Jesus' sacrifice and his violent death. Mark 1 12And straightway the Spirit driveth him forth into the wilderness.
based on 83 review