This view is forwarded by, for example, positivist interpreters, who saw Hume as suggesting that terms such as "self", "person", or "mind" referred to collections of "sense-contents".
Can we be certain that the ball will fall once it has been kicked?
Although, he is better known for his other works, such as, "A treatise of human Nature," "An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding," and "An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals," all in which he shows how limited a role reason has in the lives of humans.
Psychology has a long past, yet its real history is short. In specific Hume is trying to persuade us into the understanding of matters of fact, in which we base our lives upon and form habits towards certain things and how we grow accustom to other things surrounding us.
David Hume dedicated a portion of his philosophy in the attempts to finally put what he saw as a fallacious claim concerning the soul to rest.
Hume wrote that he "went under a Course of Bitters and Anti-Hysteric Pills", taken along with a pint of claret every day. Their causative ideas of suicide are just as dissimilar as their definitions. There are at least three interpretations of Hume's theory of causation represented in the literature: 1 the logical positivist; 2 the sceptical realist; and 3 the quasi-realist.
He is the type of philosopher that will attack some of the simple things that we accept as humans and have grown to believe over time.