This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. Both quarantine and isolation share the aim of separating certain individuals from the rest of the community in order to prevent or limit the transmission of infectious pathogens.
On some views, however, it might be claimed that the value of freedom of choice is distinguishable from the value of freedom of action. Consider now the second and third desiderata: effectiveness and opportunity cost.
Ceteris paribus, an intervention will be justified on this approach only if the expected harm to others that is averted is greater than the harm inflicted on the recipient, and this, on one interpretation the equivalent harm viewis precisely what the proportionality desideratum requires.
Another approach, especially useful for intro- ducing applied personality assessment proce- dures, is to separate more psychometric consid- erations reliability and validity from a detailed discussion of specific instruments and their in- terpretation e.
For example. Prior to doing so though, it is necessary to make the following terminological stipulation. We use the term non-consensual intervention to refer both to interventions performed without consent, and to interventions performed with invalid consent.
In The Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle makes a similar point when he claims that rational choice is a deliberative desire for things in our power Aristotlea emphasis added.
Cronbach and Meehl listed various kinds of relevant evidence: differ- ences between group including age groupscorrelations to other measures, the internal structure of the measure, factor analysis i.
Yet, if this is so, should we thus conclude that the use of Baker-Miller pink violates relational freedom in the same way that an NCMBE would?
The question we are left with is whether Harris would seek to incorporate this sort of environmental intervention into the set of cognitively mediated interventions that do not threaten freedom to fall, or into the set of interventions that would violate this freedom.