The controversy of clinical versus actuarial

Psychopathy, treatment behavior, and sex offender recidivism. Human Nature, 4, — In field settings, before the clinician can make the prediction, he has to carefully identify the criterion he can predict and choose predictive variables he wants to use.

Law and Human Behavior, 17, — Hospital and Community Psychiatry, 45, — The relationship between confidence and accuracy in clinical assessment of psychiatric patients' potential for violence. Physical attractiveness, dangerousness, and the Canadian criminal code.

Aspects of consensus in clinical predictions of imminent violence.

actuarial predictions vs clinical prediction

Google Scholar Esses, V. Google Scholar MacCoun, R.

What is the difference between clinical judgment and actuarial judgment

Implications for the use of actuarial risk assessment in forensic decision making are discussed. The reliability and validity of dangerous behavior predictions. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 33— Treatment opportunities in a maximum security psychiatric hospital: A problem survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 20, — A retrospective evaluation of the regional treatment centre sex offender treatment program. Google Scholar Gardner, W. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, — Law and Human Behavior, 5, — Google Scholar Price, R. In simple terms, judgment is the process we use to come to a decision or draw conclusions. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 25, —

Google Scholar Taylor, P. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 3, 33— Where should we intervene? Google Scholar Herman, C. In this study, Simmons compared the predictions made by a regression equation and by two experienced counselors on the school performance of JIBE freshmen Simmons 3.

The controversy of clinical versus actuarial
Rated 5/10 based on 87 review
Clinical Vs. Actuarial Judgment